Sponsored

Bill Belichick’s Girlfriend Embroiled In Transgender Controversy

By No Comments
Bill Belichick
Photo Credit: AlexanderJonesi, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

Jordon Hudson, the nearly fifty-year younger girlfriend of former New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick will be facing off against a biological male in her next beauty pageant.

After placing as first runner-up in last year’s Miss Maine USA competition, Hudson recently confirmed that she will return to compete in this year’s pageant, set to take place next month.

“Happy International Pageant Day. I couldn’t think of a better day to share with the world that I will be competing for Miss Maine USA 2025,” she posted on Instagram.

However, Hudson will be competing alongside the contest’s first-ever openly transgender contestant.

St. Cyr, a biological male, earned a spot in the Miss Maine USA pageant after winning the Miss Monson title in a local competition.

“When I started cheerleading I had all the odds stacked against me. So much pushback, so many people telling me it wasn’t a space for me,” the model said about competing on Facebook.

“But I fought for what I loved and I ended up being a very successful cheerleader, winning state and national titles and inspiring people to join even if they hadn’t been doing it their whole life.”

“I sense a similar trajectory in my ongoing journey with pageants,” St. Cyr added. “I believe I have everything it takes to be Miss Maine USA and I know that no amount of experience can match a true passion and drive to accomplish something.”

The inclusion of St. Cyr comes at a time when the Trump administration is engaged in a high-profile legal dispute with Maine over the state’s refusal to enforce a federal ban on biological males participating in female sports.

The transgender contestant reportedly entered the pageant prior to President Trump’s return to office.

On Wednesday, the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against Maine for declining to comply with the executive order restricting male athletes from competing in women’s divisions across the country.

The administration argues that the policies are necessary to ensure fairness and safety for female athletes.

Maine’s Democrat Attorney General Aaron Frey appeared on CNN to downplay the danger women face when they play with biological men.

“We’ve been working though to understand what, if any problem, exists with the participation. If some of the harms that are being alleged really are of some concern and what we’ve identified, there really are no concerns of safety,” he stated.

“There are no concerns about individuals who are just choosing which gender they want to give themselves in order to participate,” Frey continued.

“So that too is really after a lot to work on whether or not there’s any issue here that warrants this intrusion by the federal government on what’s going on in Maine schools.”

Legal developments in the women’ sports arena have recently emerged outside of Maine as well. In New Hampshire, a federal judge ruled against a group of parents who wore pink “XX” wristbands to protest the presence of a trans-identifying male on their daughters’ soccer team.

The parents were removed from school events, and their lawsuit was dismissed in a 45-page ruling by U.S. District Judge Steven McAuliffe.

The parents had protested in silence during a September 2024 match after learning that a biologically male player, Parker Tirrell, was competing on the opposing girls’ team.

“The message generally ascribed to the XX symbol, in a context such as that presented here, can reasonably be understood as directly assaulting those who identify as transgender women,” Judge McAuliffe wrote.

He claimed that gender identities are an “unalterable” characteristic that is “deeply rooted” at the core of people’s beings.

Because the school interpreted the “XX” symbol as “a demeaning and harassing message,” they rightfully protected students from “injuries likely to be suffered.”


Anthony Foote, one of the parents involved in the protest, rejected the ruling. Speaking to The New Hampshire Journal, he said, “What was our offense? Supporting girls’ sports and defending biological reality? This ruling is a slap in the face to every parent who believes schools should be a place of fairness, not political indoctrination.”

“The judge openly admitted that Pride flags are allowed because they promote ‘inclusion,’ but wristbands defending women’s sports are banned because they might ‘offend’ someone,” he added. “That’s viewpoint discrimination, plain and simple — and it’s unconstitutional.”

Meanwhile in the United Kingdom, a major legal milestone was achieved as the country’s Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the legal definition of “woman” under the 2010 Equality Act refers to biological sex, not gender identity.

The landmark ruling allows for biological women to maintain exclusive access to spaces such as female-only hospital wards, domestic violence shelters, and changing rooms.

According to the ruling, transgender individuals with gender recognition certificates (GRCs) may be excluded from these spaces if deemed “proportionate.”

Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling, a longtime critic of gender ideology, responded to the ruling with glee.

“It took three extraordinary, tenacious Scottish women with an army behind them to get this case heard by the Supreme Court and, in winning, they’ve protected the rights of women and girls across the UK. @ForWomenScot, I’m so proud to know you,” she wrote.

She followed with another post adding, “Trans people have lost zero rights today, although I don’t doubt some (not all) will be furious that the Supreme Court upheld women’s sex-based rights.”

Leave A Reply